In reaction to complaints that the Tucker Payday Lenders had been expanding loans that are abusive violation of these usury regulations, a few states begun to investigate the Tucker Payday Lenders.
To thwart these state actions, TUCKER devised a scheme to declare that their financing companies had been protected by sovereign resistance, an appropriate doctrine that, among other activities, generally stops states from enforcing their guidelines against indigenous American tribes. Starting in 2003, TUCKER joined into agreements with a few native tribes that are americanthe вЂњTribesвЂќ), like the Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska, the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, plus the Modoc Tribe of Oklahoma.
The objective of these agreements would be to result in the Tribes to claim they owned and operated areas of TUCKERвЂ™s lending that is payday, lending businesses would claim become protected by sovereign resistance.
In exchange, the Tribes received payments from TUCKER, typically one % of this profits through the part of TUCKERвЂ™s lending that is payday that the Tribes purported to possess.
To be able to produce the impression that the Tribes owned and controlled TUCKERвЂ™s payday lending business, TUCKER and MUIR involved in a number of lies and deceptions.
- MUIR as well as other counsel for TUCKER ready false declarations that are factual tribal representatives that have been submitted to convey courts, falsely claiming, on top of other things, that tribal corporations substantively owned, managed, and handled the portions of TUCKERвЂ™s company targeted by state enforcement actions.